SAIRA NARASIMHA REDDY, Film review.
The film tells about the story of a freedom fighter named narasimha reddy who was one among the 61 territorial kings of southeast india. As the conflicts between the neighbouring kingdoms were very frequent in medieval times, Narasimha reddy decides to reunite the people by celebrating a local festival of unity and thanksgiving with a hope that the united front can overthrown the British government. As we read in the history of medieval india, treason and espionages were very commonly made for the individual pride there by allowing the british to establish their power. Narasimha reddy withstands all these huddles and fights against british till his last breath there by enters into the inspiring list of warriors with unconditional nationalism, bravery and humanism.
CLAPS.
Making a historically period film which is left untold in oriental indian history is a commentable effort from a nationalistic perspective.
Artworks of the film is exorbitant with colorful landscapes, courtyards and Royalty.
Fight sequences and other thrills along with BGM makes the audience little more attendive to the story.
HOWLS.
Almost all the scenes are very similar to other films with historicity and the narratives couldnt present the story through an unprecedented way.
Usual extrapolations, nationalistic sentiments and dailogues too were seems to be a chain of cliches by which the filmmakers tried to ornate the story so that the audience may not feel anything new in its way of presentation.
RATING.
As the film can be considered more as a fantasy than a history its one time watchable and i give 2.5 out of 5.
CLAPS.
Making a historically period film which is left untold in oriental indian history is a commentable effort from a nationalistic perspective.
Artworks of the film is exorbitant with colorful landscapes, courtyards and Royalty.
Fight sequences and other thrills along with BGM makes the audience little more attendive to the story.
HOWLS.
Almost all the scenes are very similar to other films with historicity and the narratives couldnt present the story through an unprecedented way.
Usual extrapolations, nationalistic sentiments and dailogues too were seems to be a chain of cliches by which the filmmakers tried to ornate the story so that the audience may not feel anything new in its way of presentation.
RATING.
As the film can be considered more as a fantasy than a history its one time watchable and i give 2.5 out of 5.
Comments
Post a Comment